[7] The EIS estimated that the social cost of carbon from those emissions would total more than $120 billion over 30 years. [10] Most feedback they received opposed the pipeline. The Line 3 Pipeline Replacement Project would require a water appropriation permit for several types of activities. [5], The original Line 3 pipeline began operating in 1968. [10] Of the nearly 70,000 individual comments submitted, 68,244, or 94%, were in opposition. The list of permits and authorizations Enbridge must still obtain includes: The remaining environmental permits listed above relate to how the pipeline will be constructed; these permits will ensure the protection of cultural resources, water, land and wildlife during construction. [31] However, a complete Traditional Cultural Properties Survey has not been conducted of the proposed route. Prior to crossing state land or public waters with a utility infrastructure project, companies must obtain a utility crossing license from the DNR. Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Long-term lease for access roads to valves, Short-term leases for both haul and access roads, Gully 30 calcareous fen management plan authorization, Individual groundwater appropriation permit, Individual surface water appropriation permits, including Gully 30 calcareous fen, Section 401 water quality certification and anti-degradation assessment, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) industry hydrostatic discharge permit, NPDES construction stormwater general permit, NPDES general construction stormwater coverage for equipment yards. [28] Those treaties established reservations, as well as land use rights for Ojibwe people to hunt, fish, and harvest manoomin (wild rice) on the rest of that ceded territory. [30] Several Ojibwe communities have said that construction of the pipeline would violate treaty rights by disrupting and threatening the resources promised to them on their ancestral land. [5], Much of the resistance to the Line 3 project comes from concerns over climate change. Calcareous fens may not be filled, drained or otherwise degraded, wholly or partially, by any activity, unless the commissioner of natural resources expressly allows such impact under an approved management plan. (Final Line 3 Replacement Project route; click on map above for larger image). Enbridge has argued that Line 3 would help meet the demand of Minnesota's oil refineries,[63] and they're not the only companies hoping the pipeline is built. Enbridge proposed a process they call "deactivation." [1] While that project has been approved in Canada,[2] Wisconsin,[3] and North Dakota,[4] it has sparked continued resistance from climate justice groups and Native American communities in Minnesota. October 19, 2020: The DNR has made decisions granting two of ten required DNR permits, licenses and approvals for the proposed Enbridge Line 3 pipeline replacement project. Enbridge has reassured the public that pipeline safety is their primary goal, employing technology to monitor pipelines, and train employees on emergency response. The White Earth, Red Lake, Mille Lacs, Fond du Lac, and Leech Lake bands all opposed the pipeline and held status as intervening parties against the project in the PUC's initial permit deliberations. Enbridge Energy (Enbridge) is proposing to construct a new oil pipeline in Minnesota to replace its existing Line 3 pipeline. [41][49] Groups of Native activists and climate justice organizers maintain opposition to the pipeline over the potential for increased violence and drug trafficking along the proposed pipeline route.[50][51][52][53]. (Transport of oil by rail) is less economic, and more dangerous for communities, and is higher in terms of greenhouse gas emissions than modern pipelines would be. A large study published by the University of Minnesota Duluth in 2017 claimed that the Line 3 Replacement Project would create thousands of jobs. [22] Enbridge was also responsible for the 2010 Kalamazoo River oil spill in Michigan. [1] In 2014, Enbridge announced plans to build the new Line 3 pipeline. Water appropriation permits would be needed to allow Enbridge to remove water from pipeline trenches and other construction areas during project construction. [1] Many who oppose the project call this "abandonment. [39] Many landowners along the old route worry that they will bear the financial burden for the decommissioned pipe, either through costs of cleanup, removal, or lost property value. Most of this water would come from surface waters near the proposed construction activities. Each webinar was approximately 90 minutes and included a 30-minute question and answer period. Built in the 1960s, Line 3 is a 1,097-mile crude oil pipeline extending from Edmonton, Alberta to Superior, Wisconsin, and is an integral part of Enbridge's Mainline System. Unlike mines, paper plants or other industrial applications, water is not part of an ongoing process that requires treatment and monitoring. Construction in Minnesota and North Dakota will begin concurrently, once all permits and approvals have been received. [60] Climate justice organizers hold some reservations about the promise of that revenue,[61] however, citing lawsuits in which Enbridge claimed that they had been overtaxed, and left counties across Minnesota in debt for tens of millions of dollars. [64] Line 3 is seen as key to the Canadian oil industry. [29] The proposed route for the new Line 3 pipeline would cross through that protected land. A public waters work permit is needed for areas where the pipeline proposes to cross a public water wetland on non-state land. [32], Five Ojibwe bands have resisted the pipeline replacement project in court. As with the existing Line 3, the Project will be operationally integrated as part of the Enbridge Mainline System and will continue to transport crude oil from Hardisty, Alberta, Canada to Superior, Wisconsin. [13] Climate justice organizers and Native communities in Minnesota have pledged to continue resisting the pipeline's construction. [65] While climate justice organizers might celebrate the decreased output and profitability of oilfields, thousands of Canadians are losing their jobs in oil infrastructure due to that instability. [44] They demanded an end to the Line 3 project citing, among other things, “the direct link between the fossil fuel industry and Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Relatives.”[45] The Environmental Impact Statement on Line 3 acknowledges that connection as well, saying “The addition of a temporary, cash-rich workforce increases the likelihood that sex trafficking or sexual abuse will occur.”[46] Under the EIS, Enbridge was required to prepare a Human Trafficking Prevention Plan for the project. Enbridge proposes to construct a crude oil pipeline across Minnesota. The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission issued a Certificate of Need and Route Permit to Enbridge for construction of the Line 3 Pipeline Replacement. [60] That number would increase over time. Concerns about water are limited to dewatering the project site and storm water management. The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission issued a Certificate of Need and Route Permit to Enbridge for construction of the Line 3 Pipeline Replacement. [36] The Leech Lake Band also stepped back from formal appeals in December of 2018 when Enbridge agreed to remove the old pipeline from their reservation if construction of the new pipeline starts. ", "UPDATE: University of Minnesota Duluth Professor Resigns from Board of Enbridge-Backed Group in Response to PAI Report", "Line 3 EIS: Chapter 5 - Existing Conditions, Impacts, and Mitigation - Certificate of Need", "The Line 3 Replacement Project: Safety, Efficiency, Jobs", "Understanding the Minnesota DOC's Opposition Testimony for Line 3", "Enbridge prevails in Minnesota property tax challenge", "Enbridge argues Line 3 oil pipeline needed for Minnesota, region", "Enbridge Pipeline Delayed a Year in Hit to Canadian Oil Industry", "Alberta Enforces 8.7% Oil Production Cut", "Canada to lose 12,500 oil and gas jobs in 2019, report predicts, mostly in Alberta", "Pipelines: The Worst Way to Move Oil, Except For All the Rest", "Trudeau cabinet approves Trans Mountain, Line 3 pipelines, rejects Northern Gateway", "Fact Check Friday #8: Supply, demand and why pipelines like Line 3 are so important", "BEFORE THE MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS; FOR THE MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION; IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF ENBRIDGE ENERGY, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP FOR A CERTIFICATE OF NEED FOR THE LINE 3 REPLACEMENT PROJECT IN MINNESOTA FROM THE NORTH DAKOTA BORDER TO THE WISCONSIN BORDER; DIRECT TESTIMONY OF DR. MARIE FAGAN ON BEHALF OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE DIVISION OF ENERGY RESOURCES", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Enbridge_Line_3&oldid=983538961, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License, This page was last edited on 14 October 2020, at 20:18.

Last Ziegfeld Girl, Is Ann Sanders Married, Nalcor Energy Ltd, What Do Bullet Ants Look Like, Dallas Mavericks Rivals, Charli Xcx How I'm Feeling Now Review, Buccaneers Vs Panthers Stats 2020, St Rita Novena Audio,